California Proposes New Wealth Tax
By Dakessian Law | February 24, 2022
Despite unexpectedly high personal income tax receipts exceeding forecasts by $9 billion for the first seven months of California’s 2022 fiscal year, Assembly Bill 2289 proposes raising even more revenue for the State, through a brand-new annual wealth tax. This brand-new levy would apply as follows: 1.5 percent on certain assets exceeding $1 billion ($500 […]
Read More
California Budget Proposal Encourages Investments Combating Climate Change
By Dakessian Law | January 25, 2022
California has been a longtime supporter of clean-energy investments. Next year’s proposed budget promises to offer even more statutory credits and incentives. The plan includes additions to the current R&D credit for companies headquartered in California that invest in activities and technologies mitigating climate change. In addition, California plans to invest an additional $6.1 billion […]
Read More
Louisiana’s Transfer Pricing Managed Audit Program Expires April 30, 2022
By Dakessian Law | January 21, 2022
The Louisiana Department of Revenue’s (Department) voluntary initiative (RIB No. 21-029) for corporate income taxpayers will expire before you know it. The last few years have seen lengthy and complex Department field audits resulting in significant transfer pricing adjustments which make this program attractive to eligible taxpayers with numerous domestic intercompany transactions. There are clear benefits […]
Read More
California Suit Challenges Mandatory Single-Sales-Factor Apportionment
By Dakessian Law | September 16, 2021
TaxAnalysts – State Tax Notes (September 16, 2021): A lawsuit filed in California seeks to overturn the state’s mandatory single-sales-factor apportionment requirement, which it says was unlawfully passed. In One Technologies LLC v. Franchise Tax Board, a Texas company argues that it’s owed a refund for the tax it paid to California for the 2017 […]
Read More
Senior community seeks tax relief due to damage by COVID
By Dakessian Law | September 14, 2021
San Francisco Daily Journal (September 14, 2021): In what could be one of the first of many cases, the operators of a Sacramento senior living community have sued a county tax agency over its refusal to lower its assessment because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Attorney Marty H. Dakessian of Los Angeles stated in a complaint […]
Read More
California Revisits Wealth Tax
By Dakessian Law | March 15, 2021
March 15, 2021 — California legislators plan to re-introduce a first-of-its-kind wealth tax proposal similar to the one that failed in 2020. Instead of a 4% tax on wealth over $40 million, this year’s proposal would impose a 1% tax on wealth above $50 million and a 1.5% tax on wealth above $1 billion. The new […]
Read More
OTA Hears Dispute Over Application of Tax to Hookah Tobacco
By Dakessian Law | January 29, 2021
CalTaxletter (January 29, 2021): The Office of Tax Appeals held a hearing January 27 in the Appeal of Starbuzz International Inc., involving a dispute over the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration’s imposition of the tobacco products excise tax to shisha (hookah tobacco) sold by the taxpayer. Click here to view entire article. (Subscription […]
Read More
Taxpayers Entitled to Refund for 2011 Sale of Stock, OTA Rules
By Dakessian Law | December 4, 2020
CalTaxletter (December 4, 2020): Two taxpayers were entitled to a refund of $423,695 for the 2011 tax year, the Office of Tax Appeals concluded in an October 21 ruling in the Appeal of L. Conacher and J. Dea. In its 2-1 ruling, the OTA additionally denied the Franchise Tax Board’s proposal of $20,120 of additional […]
Read More
Former NFL Player Sues FTB Over Residency Issue
By Dakessian Law | May 6, 2019
Law360 (May 6, 2019): A former NFL player has sued California’s Franchise Tax Board in a dispute over whether he was a resident of the state after being drafted and owes more than $900,000, according to the player’s attorney. On Friday Joseph Keyshawn Johnson, a former wide receiver, sued the Franchise Tax Board in […]
Read More
Lawmakers, Tax Experts Debate Future of BOE
By Dakessian Law | March 18, 2019
TaxAnalysts – State Tax Notes (March 18, 2019): At the March 6 joint hearing of the Senate Governance and Finance Committee, the Budget and Fiscal Review Committee, and Budget Subcommittee No. 4 on State Administration and General Government, speakers weighed in on whether the BOE — which was stripped of all but its constitutional duties […]
Read More
Wayfair Implementation Bill Clears First Committee With Unanimous Vote
By Dakessian Law | March 1, 2019
CalTaxletter (March 1, 2019): Legislation to make changes to the California Department and Fee Administration’s implementation of South Dakota v. Wayfair, the U.S. Supreme Court decision relating to sales and use tax on transactions involving out-of-state sellers, was approved February 25 by the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee. The bill, AB 147 (Burke), received unanimous, […]
Read More
San Diego Airport Fights Fees in Hertz Suit Against City’s Port District
By Dakessian Law | August 5, 2018
Law360 (August 5, 2018) — Hertz Corp. and Enterprise RentACar Co. filed a complaint June 8 in the state Superior Court, challenging the $3.50 per rental car transaction fee imposed by the Port of San Diego in April to raise funds for a parking lot. Because the rental car lots are on airport property, the […]
Read More
IRS Pick to Face Tough Questions on Agency’s Direction
By Dakessian Law | June 28, 2018
The Hill, (June 28, 2018): The nomination of Chuck Rettig, a Beverly Hills, Calif., tax lawyer, comes at a critical moment for the IRS, which is tasked with implementing the new Republican tax law and needs to quickly modernize its technology. Tax lawyers who know Rettig say his background will be valuable because he understands […]
Read More
New IRS Chief Charles Rettig May Help Reform Embattled Agency
By Dakessian Law | February 12, 2018
Mardiros “Marty” Dakessian of Dakessian Law Ltd. in Los Angeles told Law360 he has known Rettig since around 2000 and that Rettig has the ability to “bring people together” in addition to having demonstrated integrity while representing taxpayers and playing a leadership role in multiple bar associations. Whatever Rettig’s priorities will be, whether they end up […]
Read More
California Governor Appoints Head of New Tax Agency
By Dakessian Law | July 17, 2017
Governor Jerry Brown has appointed Nicolas Maduros as director of the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration as part of a major transition overhauling the State Board of Equalization’s (BOE) long-standing tax authority. Marty Dakessian said he’s hopeful that the Brown administration will consider input from stakeholders as it takes over the BOE’s adjudicative […]
Read More
Bill to Overhaul California BOE Racing Through Legislature
By Dakessian Law | June 15, 2017
California Legislature seeks to pass Assembly Bill 102 (A.B. 102) as part of the state’s budget. A.B. 102 is a significant overhaul of the system for administering California taxes and a significant reduction in responsibilities of the Board of Equalization (BOE). If enacted, A.B. 102 would establish two new agencies – the California Department of […]
Read More
Retroactive Tax Laws Muddying Businesses’ Future Decisions
By Dakessian Law | May 22, 2017
According to Mardiros “Marty” Dakessian of Dakessian Law Ltd., the justices dropped the ball on offering clarity on a longstanding issue that has left businesses vulnerable to the “dangerous” possibility of states overturning court decisions through legislative action. “Michigan has undermined the rule of law in their own state,” Dakessian said. “In my opinion, by […]
Read More
FTB Riding High After Summary Judgment Win in Harley Commerce Clause Case
By Dakessian Law | November 2, 2016
A San Diego trial court has ruled in favor of the FTB in what could be one of the biggest cases in the history of California tax litigation (ruling attached). The case of Harley-Davidson v. Franchise Tax Board concerns whether a California law that allows only in-state taxpayers to elect unitary or separate company filing […]
Read More
Marty Dakessian Featured in Bloomberg BNA Report about LA’s Hotel Tax on AirBNB
By Dakessian Law | August 1, 2016
In a recent Bloomberg BNA report, Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer filed four civil and criminal complaints against landlords who were renting out apartment buildings through AirBNB. The city attorney alleged that the landlords were engaged in illegal activity that was exacerbating the City’s shortage of affordable housing. These civil actions follow a recent […]
Read More
California Franchise Tax Board Recognizes Taxpayers Will Appeal Gillette Ruling
By Dakessian Law | February 29, 2016
Since the Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board ruling plans to be appealed in the United States Supreme Court, the California FTB is recommending taxpayers and their representatives to wait until the conclusion of litigation before taking action on cases regarding the Multistate Tax Compact election issue. On December 31, 2015, the California Supreme Court […]
Read More
California Supreme Court Rules Against Taxpayers in Multistate Tax Compact Apportionment Case
By Dakessian Law | January 11, 2016
Reversing the California Court of Appeal in a case in which the issue was whether, for years between 1993 and 2005, multistate businesses (Taxpayers) could elect the standard, i.e., equal-weighted, 3-factor apportionment formula set forth in the Multistate Tax Compact (Compact) for purposes of apportioning their business income to California or were required to use […]
Read More
Attorney Dakessian Talks About Court Upholding Tax Law That Helps CA Businesses
By Dakessian Law | January 1, 2016
As of late December 2015, the Supreme Court upheld a state law that readjusted multistate businesses’ income taxes; however, it only helped the companies based in California and harmed out-of-state businesses. This ruling impacted six major firms, including Proctor & Gamble, Sigma-Aldrich, Jones Apparel Group, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark and RB Holdings. They sought a $34 million […]
Read More
Judge awards firm $1.2 million in fees in taxation case
By Dakessian Law | June 18, 2013
In 2013, Attorney Dakessian represented a real estate company in Nevada that was being subjected to taxation in California. The real estate firm was told to pay $2.27 million in back taxes by the Franchise Tax Board in 2000, after being audited. The owner of the firm was a resident of California and he paid […]
Read More